EUGENE, Ore. — (Oct. 2, 2013) — A component in saliva has opened a window into a person's psychological health, reflecting resiliency in the face of stress, say researchers at the University of Oregon and Arizona State University.
That component is salivary nerve growth factor, a neurotrophic protein abbreviated as sNGF. It typically is linked to the survival, development or function of neurons, but now may be a marker of stress response.
"We usually focus on the depleting aspects of the stress response, but now we are recognizing that there may be a regenerative or replenishing aspect," said Heidemarie Laurent, a professor of psychology at the UO and lead author on a study published Sept. 27 in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine. "We are seeing that sNGF responds to stress, and that this response relates to both short-term and more lasting measures of psychological health — in other words, sNGF seems to underlie resilience rather than risk."
For the study, Laurent collected five saliva samples from 40 young adults (17 male, 23 female) twice before and three times following a stressful conflict-resolution task. The participants were drawn from a larger study of romantic couples. Samples also were taken from a 20-member control group at the same time intervals but in the absence of the conflict scenario. Samples were analyzed for sNGF and two other stress-linked indicators. Changes in sNGF were significant in the experimental group in response to the conflict.
The saliva was analyzed at ASU's newly opened Institute for Interdisciplinary Salivary Bioscience Research, which is headed by study co-author Douglas A. Granger, a pioneer in the field of salivary bioscience. "The use of oral fluid as a research and diagnostic specimen has tremendous potential,” said ASU's Granger, a professor of psychology. "Have you ever wondered why adversity affects some people more negatively than others? Well, it is possible that sNGF is an important piece of that puzzle."
Nerve growth factor was discovered in the 1950s by Italian neurologist Rita Levi-Montalcini and Stanley Cohen in collaborative research done at Washington University in St. Louis; they later shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1986. Much has been uncovered about its role in the brain and nervous system, but few scientists considered how NGF levels in people's saliva might be related to the behavioral and biological components of the body's stress response.
Laurent and Granger recently reported that conflict with a romantic partner caused sNGF to rise in parallel with the two main components of the "fight or flight" stress response — the autonomic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Most significantly, the researchers found that the more a person's sNGF level increased in response to stress, the lower their conflict-related negative emotions.
"This finding," Laurent said, "suggests that an sNGF response to stress might be protective, a counterpoint to other aspects of the stress response known to negatively impact mental and physical health. This is consistent with what we’re finding in adolescents, where higher levels of sNGF during stress are associated with lower levels of problem behaviors."
The group's new paper is the first of a series related to sNGF and its benefits in the study of social relationships and behavior. "One of the things that makes sNGF so different is that it is related to positive attributes," Granger said. "So rather than being a risk marker, sNGF has the potential to index resilience. This research offers important insights that could revolutionize the way adaptive stress responses are understood and measured — not simply as activation in any one system, but as a pattern of activation across multiple, linked systems."
"Researchers at the University of Oregon continue to lead the way in prevention science," said Kimberly Andrews Espy, vice president for research and innovation and dean of the UO Graduate School. "This valuable research by Dr. Laurent identifying a new means of measuring stress response is helping to yield critical insights into psychological health that may lead to new prevention and intervention strategies."
Laurent is a new faculty member in the UO's Department of Psychology and an adjunct faculty member at the ASU institute. At the time of the study, Laurent was at the University of Wyoming. Sean M. Laurent, an adjunct professor of psychology at the UO, also was a co-author.
The research was supported by faculty grant-in-aid from the University of Wyoming and a basic research grant from the UW College of Arts and Sciences.
About the University of Oregon
The University of Oregon is among the 108 institutions chosen from 4,633 U.S. universities for top-tier designation of "Very High Research Activity" in the 2010 Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. The UO also is one of two Pacific Northwest members of the Association of American Universities.
Media Contacts: Jim Barlow, director of science and research communications, 541-346-3481, email@example.com, and Margaret Coulombe, Arizona State University, 480-727-8934, Margaret.Coulombe@asu.edu
Editor's Note: Co-author Douglas Granger is founder and chief strategy and scientific adviser at Salimetrics LLC in State College, Pa. His relationship with Salimetrics is managed by the Conflict of Interest Committee at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Sources: Heidemarie Laurent, assistant professor of psychology, title, 541-346-7051, firstname.lastname@example.org, and Douglas Granger, director of the ASU Institute for Interdisciplinary Salivary Bioscience Research, 814-933-7376, Douglas.Granger@asu.edu
Note: The University of Oregon is equipped with an on-campus television studio with a point-of-origin Vyvx connection, which provides broadcast-quality video to networks worldwide via fiber optic network. In addition, there is video access to satellite uplink, and audio access to an ISDN codec for broadcast-quality radio interviews.