New tests again link nanodiamonds to cosmic event theory

Microscope in the University of Oregon's CAMCOR provides key evidence in new paper

Map shows the Younger Dryas Boundary Field covered in research so farEUGENE, Ore. — Aug. 28, 2014 — Tiny diamonds invisible to human eyes but confirmed by a powerful microscope at the University of Oregon are shining new light on the idea proposed in 2007 that a cosmic event — an exploding comet above North America — sparked catastrophic climate change 12,800 years ago.

In a paper appearing online ahead of print in the Journal of Geology, scientists from 21 universities in six countries report the definitive presence of nanodiamonds at some 32 sites in 11 countries on three continents in layers of darkened soil at the Earth's Younger Dryas boundary.

Joshua Razink stands by a CAMCOR-based HR-TEM used in new studyThe boundary layer is widespread, the researchers found. The miniscule diamonds, which often form during large impact events, are abundant along with cosmic impact spherules, high-temperature melt-glass, fullerenes, grape-like clusters of soot, charcoal, carbon spherules, glasslike carbon, heium-3, iridium, osmium, platinum, nickel and cobalt.

The combination of components is similar to that found in soils connected with the 1908 in-air explosion of a comet over Siberia and those found in the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary (KTB) layer that formed 65 million years ago when a comet or asteroid struck off Mexico and wiped out dinosaurs worldwide.

In the Oct. 9, 2007, issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a 26-member team from 16 institutions proposed that a cosmic impact event set off a 1,300-year-long cold spell known as the Younger Dryas. Prehistoric Clovis culture was fragmented, and widespread extinctions occurred across North America. Former UO researcher Douglas Kennett, a co-author of the new paper and now at Pennsylvania State University, was a member of the original study.

In that paper and in a series of subsequent studies, reports of nanodiamond-rich soils were documented at numerous sites. However, numerous critics refuted the findings, holding to a long-running theory that over-hunting sparked the extinctions and that the suspected nanodiamonds had been formed by wildfires, volcanism or occasional meteoritic debris, rather than a cosmic event.
 
HR-TEM image of a large nanodiamond from a site in GreenlandThe glassy and metallic materials in the YDB layers would have formed at temperatures in excess of 2,200 degrees Celsius and could not have resulted from the alternative scenarios, said co-author James Kennett, professor emeritus at the University of California, Santa Barbara, in a news release. He also was on the team that originally proposed a comet-based event.

In the new paper, researchers slightly revised the date of the theorized cosmic event and cited six examples of independent research that have found consistent peaks in the creation of the nanodiamonds that match their hypothesis.

"The evidence presented in this paper rejects the alternate hypotheses and settles the debate about the existence of the nanodiamonds," said the paper's corresponding author Allen West of GeoScience Consulting of Dewey, Arizona. "We provide the first comprehensive review of the state of the debate and about YDB nanodiamonds deposited across three continents."

West worked in close consultation with researchers at the various labs that conducted the independent testing, including with co-author Joshua J. Razink, operator and instrument manager since 2011 of the UO's state-of-the-art high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) in the Center for Advanced Materials Characterization in Oregon (CAMCOR).

Razink was provided with samples previously cited in many of the earlier studies, as well as untested soil samples delivered from multiple new sites. The samples were placed onto grids and analyzed thoroughly, he said.

"These diamonds are incredibly small, on the order of a few nanometers and are invisible to the human eye and even to an optical microscope," Razink said. "For reference, if you took a meter stick and cut it into one billion pieces, each of those pieces is one nanometer. The only way to really get definitive characterization that these are diamonds is to use tools like the transmission electron microscope. It helps us to rule out that the samples are not graphene or copper. Our findings say these samples are nanodiamonds."

In addition to the HR-TEM done at the UO, researchers also used standard TEM, electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), selected area diffraction (SAD), fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithms, and energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM).

"The chemical processing methods described in the paper," Razink said, "lay out with great detail the methodology that one needs to go through in order to prepare their samples and identify these diamonds."

Another UO co-author on the new paper is Jon M. Erlandson, executive director of the Museum of Natural and Cultural History, who was a co-author on the paper that first proposed the cosmic event.

Other co-authors on the new paper are: Charles R. Kinzie, Adrienne Stich, Kevin A. Tague and Wendy S. Wolbach, all of DePaul University in Chicago; Shane S. Que Hee of the University of California, Los Angeles; Chris Mercer of the National Institute for Materials Science in Tsukuba, Japan; Paul S. DeCarli of SRI International in Menlo Park, California; Ted E. Bunch and James H. Wittke of Northern Arizona University; Isabel Israde-Alcantara of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo in Mexico, James L. Bischoff of the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California; Albert C. Goodyear of the University of South Carolina; Kenneth B. Tankersley of the University of Cincinnati; David R. Kimbel of Kimstar Research in Fayetteville, North Carolina;  Brendan J. Culleton of Pennsylvania State University; Thomas W. Stafford of the University of Aarhus in Denmark; Johan B. Kloosterman of Exploration Geologist in The Netherlands; Andrew M. T. Moore of the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York; Richard B. Firestone of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California; J. E. Aura Tortosa of the Universitat de Valencia in Spain; and J. F. Jorda Pardo of the Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia in Spain.

Funding cited in the study came from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant: 1S10 RR017770), U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02–05CH11231) and the National Science Foundation (9986999, ATM-0713769 and OCE-0825322).

Media Contact: Jim Barlow, director of science and research communications, 541-346-3481, jebarlow@uoregon.edu



Sources: Joshua Razink, instrument manager, Center for Advanced Materials Characterization in Oregon, 541-346-4759, jrazink@uoregon.edu, and Allen West, GeoScience Consulting, allen7633@aol.com

Note: The University of Oregon is equipped with an on-campus television studio with a point-of-origin Vyvx connection, which provides broadcast-quality video to networks worldwide via fiber optic network. In addition, there is video access to satellite uplink, and audio access to an ISDN codec for broadcast-quality radio interviews.
 

Gallery

Joshua Razink in front of a high-resolution transmission electron microscope
Joshua Razink stands by a CAMCOR-based HR-TEM used in new study
Map shows the Younger Dryas Boundary Field covered in research so far
HR-TEM image of a large nanodiamond from a site in Greenland